|
Historic environmental issues of cropland habitat
differ from those related to other habitat types. Cropland is the
only habitat that occupies more acreage in Illinois today than it
did 150 years ago. In fact, outside of small agricultural fields
and plots developed by Illinois' Native Americans, cropland was
non-existent 250 years ago. While loss of habitat creage isn't a
problem for wildlife using cropland like it is for species dependent
on wetlands, woodlands, and Grasslands changes have occurred in
cropping systems since the 1960s that have negatively affected wildlife.
These changes are significant because they have occurred over a
very large land base. Three changes are especially important:
- The types of crops grown
- The intensity of cropping
- The management of agricultural lands
Table 6.1 "Selected
Wildlife That Use Cropland Environments"
Types of Crops Grown
From the early days of Illinois agriculture until
the middle part of the 20th century, a broad mixture of crops was
grown. Fields were frequently rotated, from hay, to corn, to small
grains such as wheat and oats, and back to hay again. Both temporary
and permanent pastures also formed part of the cropland mosaic.
These early agricultural practices actually increased numbers of
some species, such as prairie chickens, loggerhead shrikes, and
Bobwhite quail.
This crop rotation and mixture of uses created
habitat diversity on the landscape. The increased habitat variety
in turn resulted in a diverse food chain base-insects, spiders and
other invertebrates, rodents, reptiles, and amphibians-and ultimately
provided for a variety of other wildlife, such as birds and larger
mammals. The seasonal changes in the crops also provided cover that
was disturbed at varying intervals, giving many wildlife species
a better chance of nesting, raising young, and finding undisturbed
habitat nearby when a particular site was tilled or harvested.
Today, two-thirds of our croplands grow only corn
and soybeans. Neither crop can offer the diversity of wildlife cover
provided by hay, pasture, and small grains. Hay and pasture, in
particular, once provided a partial substitute for the millions
of acres of native prairie that were lost. Corn and soybeans simply
can't furnish the same type of habitat.
The hay-field crops grown in Illinois today also
differ from those of the late 1800s and early to mid-1900s. Much
of the hay produced now is alfalfa rather than the clover-grass
mixtures of earlier days. Like corn and soybeans, alfalfa as a single
plant provides for a less-diverse insect community. Crops grown
as monocultures also provide less variety of post-harvest waste
grain and seeds for wildlife consumption. In addition, many permanent
pastures have been converted to monotypic tall fescue that is too
dense for most wildlife to use.
Intensity of Cropping
Though cultivated acreage increased steadily in
Illinois after the invention of the steel moldboard plow in 1837,
it has been only since the 1960s that the intensity and scope of
agricultural land use-for example, "fencerow-to-fencerow" farming-have
increased dramatically. This change has occurred as a result of
several interrelated factors.
Machinery has gotten much larger, faster, and more
efficient in recent decades. As a result, farmers can plant, harvest,
and till more acres of row crops in less time. Another important
factor has been federal agricultural policies. which have encouraged
farmers to increase feed-grain output. As a result, more acres of
pasture, hay, and small grains have been converted to row crops
along with shrubby fencerows, odd grassy areas, and hedgerows, making
field sizes much larger, with little or no edge or interspersed
habitat.
These changes have reduced the overall amount and
quality of habitat for wildlife that once thrived along the edges
of crop fields or traveled between the croplands, Grasslands woodlands,
and wetlands. Also, "wet spots," the ephemeral wetlands, continue
to be drained in agricultural fields, further reducing the potential
value of cropland to wildlife.
Management of Agricultural Lands
The primary management practices that can influence
cropland's value to wildlife are tillage, pesticide application,
and mowing. Conservation tillage is now widely used on Illinois
croplands. The residue from previous years' crops remains on the
surface and provides significant habitat to many wildlife species
throughout the year. And a food source is provided for many animals
when the postharvest waste grain is not turned under in the fall.
Crop stubble also distributes snow more evenly in the winter, preventing
heavy accumulation of snow in protective wildlife cover such as
fencerows, grassed waterways, drainage-ditch banks, and terraces.
However, millions of acres of Illinois cropland
continue to be tilled more extensively than is needed for optimum
crop production. Besides eliminating valuable food and cover for
wildlife, extensive tillage often causes off-site damage to wildlife
habitat. It promotes soil erosion and causes sedimentation and pollution
in aquatic habitats.
Integrated pest management strategies are being
used over more acres, which may help reduce pesticide use over the
long term. However, many pesticides are much more potent, and the
use of pesticides still warrants concern. Rodenticides and insecticides
have caused the most significant negative impacts to wildlife, and
as a result they are now highly regulated. Many cases of poisoning
have occurred in a variety of species, from eagles, songbirds, and
game birds to various mammals, as an indirect result of pesticide
application. Eggshell thinning in raptors, caused by the now-banned
DDT, is a classic example.
As predators higher in the food chain consume dead
or dying invertebrates or vertebrates targeted in a pesticide application,
the pesticide may be passed on to the animal eating the poisoned
bug or rodent. Immediate toxic effects may result, or there may
be a delayed result from the cumulative effect of eating numerous
poisoned prey.
Insecticide application also reduces the overall
number of insects, reducing the food base for many wildlife species.
A general insecticide application can also negatively impact crop
fields themselves, because many insects that are beneficial (because
they consume harmful insects or act as pollinators) are destroyed
in the process. While some of the most persistent insecticides,
like DDT, have been banned in the U.S. inappropriate use of approved
products still impacts wildlife.
Herbicides used to control grasses or broadleaf
weeds are not targeted to destroy insects, spiders, or vertebrate
animals, but they may injure or eliminate some species. And eliminating
all weeds destroys host plants for many beneficial insects. Destroying
all weeds also removes potential food sources (seeds) and possible
nesting sites for some wildlife species.
Mowing in waterways, terraces, odd areas, field
borders, roadsides, or crop fields reduces wildlife abundance, especially
if done during nesting season. Keeping these areas visually tidy
requires early and frequent mowing. Nesting cover, foraging cover,
and often incubating adults, nests, and young themselves are destroyed
when mowing is done during prime nesting and brooding season (April
1 to August 1). Conversely, late-season mowing (after September
15) destroys important winter cover and food for many species. Too
much unnecessary mowing has hurt wildlife.
Some species have actually increased in the last
40 years in response to the growth in Illinois' row-crop acreage.
Apparently they are less affected by cropping systems, pesticide
use, mowing, and tillage practices. Among these are red-winged blackbirds,
killdeers, and horned larks. But the great majority of Illinois
native wildlife species have decreased as a result of agriculture's
intensification and mechanization.
While most agricultural land in Illinois will never
return to prairie, forest, or wetland, moderating some of the more
recent changes in agricultural land management to address wildlife
and other environmental considerations is essential to our wildlife's
future. Even small changes, when adopted on large cropland acreages,
can have a positive impact on the future of Illinois wildlife and
can provide improved environmental health for humans.
|